|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Round
By far the most preferred diamond shape,
the round-brilliant cut is also the most optically brilliant because of
its 360-degree symmetrical shape. A round brilliant is a great choice if
you want the most sparkle and the most enduring classic shape. The round
shape has been cut for centuries, but in 1919, Marcel Tolkowsky defined
specific angles and proportions to yield the most brilliant diamond, which
form the basis for the modern "Ideal" cut round-brilliant
diamond. Round-brilliant diamonds are the only shape to have this ideal
proportion defined. The round silhouette works with almost every mounting,
from classic solitaires to the most avant-garde designs. Rounds can be set
into four or six prongs, based on the design of the setting, or into bezel
mountings (a metal band that runs around the edge of the diamond to hold
it securely in the setting). In general, if the round brilliant has an
Ideal cut or Very Good cut, you want the setting to have the least amount
of metal around the stone so that it is held securely but does not cover
up too much of the diamond and block light from entering the stone. |
| |
|
Princess
The princess cut is a modern classic of
clean, square lines and beautiful sparkle. This shape is the perfect
choice if you prefer a square or rectangular outline but want the
brilliance of a round. Developed in the 1970s, the princess cut is now
second only to the round brilliant in popularity. The cutting of this
diamond combines the step-cutting of the emerald cut with the triangular
facets of the brilliant cut and is cut with right-angle corners. Although
most prefer a square outline, some stones are cut with a slightly more
rectangular outline. The princess cut works beautifully as a solitaire but
also looks great paired with side stones, especially trillions or smaller
princess-cut diamonds. It is important to protect the more vulnerable
corners with a V-shaped prong at each point. |
| |
|
Asscher
This elegant shape is a variation on a
classic emerald cut, developed in 1902 by the venerable Asscher brothers
in Holland. The Asscher cut is not a traditional choice but has gained
deserved exposure recently because of celebrities wearing the cut. The
uniqueness of this shape is defined by the pavilion, or bottom part of the
diamond, that has a "scissor cut" with all facets step-cut down
toward the culet, or point on the bottom. The blocked corners add to its
geometric appeal, making the diamond appear almost octagonal. It is
usually cut to a square outline as opposed to rectangular. This diamond
shape is beautiful in a simple solitaire or in a setting that has simple
geometric lines or side stones such as baguettes. Ideally, the setting for
an Asscher cut should not hide the unique blocked corners. |
| |
|
Marquise
The marquise cut is a regal, elongated
shape with tapering points at both ends. Its shape tends to flatter the
finger, making it appear longer. When choosing a marquise cut, the
length-to-width ratio should be considered. Usually a ratio of 2:1.0 is
preferred, meaning that the length of the stone should be about 2 times
the width of the diamond. However, like all fancy shapes, personal
preference prevails, and some may prefer a shorter, wider outline or
longer, thinner shape. Just look for good symmetry to ensure overall
beauty no matter what outline you prefer. This shape works in a simple
solitaire setting or looks beautiful with side stones, especially baguette
or trillion shapes. A marquise-cut diamond should be mounted with six
prongs: four positioned on the sides to hold the body of the stone
securely and two V-shaped prongs to protect the points at either end, the
most vulnerable part of the diamond. |
| |
|
Emerald
The emerald-cut diamond is among the most
classic of diamond shapes. Its clean lines come from step-cutting, or
parallel line facets. It is always cut with blocked corners and is usually
cut to a rectangular outline, although a few are cut to be more square.
Because of its simpler faceting structure, larger inclusions are sometimes
more visible to the unaided eye, so diamonds cut in this shape usually
need to be higher clarity (I1 or I2 clarities should probably be avoided).
Length-to-width ratios should be considered when choosing an emerald cut:
Usually a 1.50:1.00 ratio is preferred, meaning that the length of the
stone should be about 1½ times the width of the diamond. However, like
all fancy shapes, personal preference prevails, and some may prefer a
squarer outline, or longer, thinner rectangle. An emerald cut is loved by
purists and looks especially wonderful set in platinum, in a simple
setting or a baguette side-stone setting. |
| |
|
Radiant
The radiant cut is a beautiful combination
of the classic emerald cut and the sparkle of the round brilliant. The
radiant cut is similar to the princess cut but is usually (though not
always) a more rectangular outline and has blocked corners like those of
an emerald cut. The cutting is a combination of the step-cutting of the
emerald-cut diamond with some triangular faceting of the brilliant cut.
The radiant cut is dramatic as a solitaire but also looks great paired
with side stones such as baguettes, trillions, or princess shapes. A
radiant-cut stone should be set with special prongs to hold the blocked
corners securely. |
| |
|
Cushion
The cushion cut is an unusual diamond shape
and an interesting alternative to an oval- or princess-cut diamond.
Because these are relatively rare, this shape is for someone who wants
something few people possess. The modern cushion shape is based on an
antique cushion cut, which is a combination of round and square outline
with a softened square or "pillow" shape. A cushion-cut may be
squarer with length and width in equal proportion, or may have a slightly
elongated outline, depending on the individual stone and the wearer's
preference. As a solitaire, it makes a statement and also looks wonderful
paired with side stones such as baguettes. A cushion-cut diamond setting
should have at least four secure prongs. |
| |
|
Pear
The pear shape is a beautiful, feminine
diamond shape with a rounded end on one side and a tapering point at the
other. It is lovely as the center stone in a ring or outstanding as a
pendant or pair of drop earrings. As with many fancy shapes,
length-to-width ratio should be considered. Usually a ratio of 1.5:1.0 is
preferred, meaning that the length of the stone should be about 1½ times
the width of the diamond. Some may prefer a shorter, wider outline or a
longer, thinner shape. Good symmetry is a must for pear-cut diamonds. This
will ensure that light is reflected evenly, especially in the point. The
asymmetrical shape should be considered when setting a pear cut, which
looks beautiful as a solitaire, or with side stones, especially smaller
pear-cut stones or baguettes. A pear-shaped diamond should be mounted in a
special setting with five prongs: two to hold the rounded end, two to hold
the curved sides of the stone securely, and one V-shaped prong to protect
the point at the other end, the most vulnerable part of the diamond. |
| |
|
Oval
The oval cut is most similar a
round-brilliant cut and combines the round's sparkle with a flattering,
elongated outline. It makes a good choice for someone who wants a unique
shape but loves the fire and brilliance of a round diamond. The
length-to-width ratio of ovals can vary based on personal preference.
Generally a ratio of 1.5:1.0 is preferred, meaning that the length of the
stone should be about 1½ times the width of the diamond. However, like
all fancy shapes, personal choice should guide you; some may prefer a
shorter, wider outline or a longer, thinner shape. The relatively
symmetrical shape lends itself well to a variety of mounting styles. Most
oval cuts look great in any mounting meant for a round brilliant as long
as the setting that holds the diamond has six prongs properly spaced for
security. |
| |
|
Heart
The heart-shaped diamond is the most
romantic of diamond shapes. It is similar to the pear shape but has a
cleft in the rounded end that forms the lobes of the heart. The complexity
of the shape requires skilled cutting to ensure proper brilliance.
Symmetry is a big consideration for this shape, as the outline needs to
have a pleasing, obvious heart outline apparent in the setting. The lobes
should be rounded (not pointed) and clearly defined. Heart-shaped diamonds
should be mounted in special settings with five prongs: two at the lobes
of the heart, two on the sides of the heart, and a V-shaped prong to
protect the point of the heart, the most vulnerable place on the diamond. |
| |
|
Trillion
The trillion cut is a dramatic cut that
makes a bold statement. It was developed in the 1970s as a variation of
the radiant cut, combining step-cutting and brilliant faceting. While
often used as side stones, this cut is rarely used for the center diamond,
so it is somewhat scarce in larger sizes. The triangular shape needs to be
considered with the style of mounting and would probably go best in a
simple solitaire or geometric setting that works with the unique shape.
The trillion cut will require a special setting that has V-shaped-prongs
to protect the corners of the diamond. |
|
|
|